Don't Be The Nerdiest Person In The Room

Technical language has its place, but overuse hampers compliance

Glenn S. Phillips, Contributor

May 24, 2012

2 Min Read
Dark Reading logo in a gray background | Dark Reading

In the interest of full disclosure, I am fluent in "nerd." I have an engineering degree and years of experience working on technical projects. I know the purpose of a processor reset pin, why "i" is the most common loop counter for software developers, and the purpose of a debounce function in a keyboard driver. Only recently did I give away my EPROM programmer.

In any specialized field, a corresponding technical language is almost always very important. It allows for greater precision, accuracy, and efficiency. We don't want our surgeon to ask for "that long, sharp, curved knife" when we're on the operating table. Surgery requires a number of highly specialized instruments, and accurate, efficient communication between a surgeon and his team is a matter of life and death.

Likewise, designing and managing secure and compliant data systems requires language and terminology a home PC user would never need. For your business, however, precise technical language is not only helpful, it can be a matter of life and death.

Technical documentation designed for other technical professionals must include such precise, technical language to ensure that the systems are secure and verifiable. Such technical documents are a required part of every compliance process.

It is important to recognize that even though highly technical documentation is critical for proper system operation and for passing compliance audits, this level of documentation alone is insufficient. The processes and procedures of people must also be documented and done so in a way that makes sense to the people performing these tasks.

Using jargon and complex technical terms may create important-looking documentation. Unfortunately, this type of documentation can not only be inappropriate for your nontechnical employees and end users, but also absolutely useless. If the documentation governing "people processes" is unusable by your people, then probably the correct people processes necessary for compliance are not happening.

For instance, which of these statements will a nontechnical employee mostly likely remember and follow daily:

Read more about:

2012

About the Author

Glenn S. Phillips

Contributor

Glenn works with business leaders who want to leverage technology and understand the often hidden risks awaiting them. The Founder and Sr. Consultant of Forte' Incorporated, Glenn and his team work with business leaders to support growth, increase profits, and address dangerous risks lurking in their processes and technology.

A variety of media outlets quote Glenn, including The Wall Street Journal, ABC News Now, Psychology Today, and Entrepreneur magazine and he is the author of the book Nerd-to-English: Your Everyday Guide to Translating Your Business, Your Messages, and Yourself.

Glenn periodically plays his really ugly tuba (complete with a bullet hole in the bell), enjoys a good pun, great music, and dark chocolate.

Keep up with the latest cybersecurity threats, newly discovered vulnerabilities, data breach information, and emerging trends. Delivered daily or weekly right to your email inbox.

You May Also Like


More Insights