EFS Ransomware Slips by AV Products

Inside of Windows is a methodology called Encrypting File System. It works on individual files or folders, rather than at the whole disk level like BitLocker does.

Larry Loeb, Blogger, Informationweek

January 23, 2020

3 Min Read

Inside of Windows is a methodology called Encrypting File System (EFS). It works on individual files or folders, rather than at the whole disk level like BitLocker does. Researchers at SafeBreach have discovered that it can be used to create a new kind of ransomware as well.

EFS shows up in the business editions of Windows (like Pro, Professional, Business, Ultimate, Enterprise and Education). The encryption/decryption is carried out in the NTFS driver. Encryption/decryption is transparent to the user.

The SafeBreachers came up with a way for EFS to function as the encryptor as well as the decrypt in a ransomware scheme. The eight steps of its operation are detailed in their blog, if those details are germane.

But, the major effect of all this is that a new sort of ransomware was found to be practical. Worse (for users) is the range of affected versions the researchers found to be vulnerable. They said that "The EFS ransomware was tested with Windows 10 64-bit versions 1803, 1809 and 1903, but should also work on Windows 32-bit operating systems, and on earlier versions of Windows (probably Windows 8.x, Windows 7 and Windows Vista)." That's pretty much everything.

None of the Windows versions would detect the EFS ransomware as it functioned. Frankly, this is to be expected since the form and functionality of the EFS ransomware is novel.

The ransomware has functionality that contributed to it successfully carrying out its malicious mission. Because the files are encrypted at the NTFS driver level, it goes unnoticed by file-system filter drivers. Also, EFS ransomware doesn't require administrator rights. It will work well in limited user accounts. Finally, the EFS ransomware doesn't require human interaction. No social engineering to assure an action is needed.

But there are some shortcomings as well. There is a visible indicator (a small yellow padlock icon displayed at the top right corner of the file/folder main icon) that shows that something is going on during encryption.

If a Data Recovery Agent has been previously defined, it will make recovery "trivial," according to SafeBreach.

EFS can be turned off (and defeat the ransomware) for a machine by setting the registry key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\EFS\EfsConfiguration to 1. Accessing this key requires administrator rights.

Late last year, SafeBreach shared what they were doing with major AV vendors. Some vendors (like F-Secure and Panda) would detect the approach and flag it, but most other vendors were forced to issue software updates to account for the possibility it presented.

Microsoft just huffed about it. They replied, "Microsoft considers Controlled Folder Access a defense-in-depth feature. We assessed this submittal to be a moderate class defense in depth issue, which does not meet the Microsoft Security Servicing Criteria for Windows."

SafeBreach summarizes the problem succinctly. "Signature-based solutions are not up to this job," they say, but "heuristics-based (and even more so -- generic technology-based) solutions seem more promising, but additional proactive research is required in order to "train" them against future threats."

— Larry Loeb has written for many of the last century's major "dead tree" computer magazines, having been, among other things, a consulting editor for BYTE magazine and senior editor for the launch of WebWeek.

Read more about:

Security Now

About the Author

Larry Loeb

Blogger, Informationweek

Larry Loeb has written for many of the last century's major "dead tree" computer magazines, having been, among other things, a consulting editor for BYTE magazine and senior editor for the launch of WebWeek. He has written a book on the Secure Electronic Transaction Internet protocol. His latest book has the commercially obligatory title of Hack Proofing XML. He's been online since uucp "bang" addressing (where the world existed relative to !decvax), serving as editor of the Macintosh Exchange on BIX and the VARBusiness Exchange. His first Mac had 128 KB of memory, which was a big step up from his first 1130, which had 4 KB, as did his first 1401. You can e-mail him at [email protected].

Keep up with the latest cybersecurity threats, newly discovered vulnerabilities, data breach information, and emerging trends. Delivered daily or weekly right to your email inbox.

You May Also Like


More Insights